AiiSH-iR

Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nike Gnanateja, G
dc.contributor.author Sandeep Maruthy
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-31T11:02:20Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-31T11:02:20Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.issn 1878-5891
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.008
dc.identifier.uri http://192.168.100.26:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3864
dc.description.abstract The dichotic frequency following responses (FFR) have been used in studies to infer about dichotic auditory processing. In the present study, we hypothesize that the proximity of the binaural neural generators of the FFR would result in interference of the volume-conducted electrical fields. This might lead to contamination of the scalp-recorded dichotic FFRs due to which it might be difficult to infer about true dichotic processing in the putative neural generators. We investigated this by recording FFRs to binaurally presented 200?Hz pure tone with graded dichotic phase offsets (0°, 90°, 180° and 270°) in normal hearing young adults. Spectral analysis of the FFRs was performed for the estimation of the magnitude and phase at the component frequencies. FFR spectra were compared using non-parametric paired randomizations within the subjects. We found that the brainstem responses to a 200?Hz pure tone consisted of prominent peaks at 200?Hz, and at frequencies corresponding to the harmonics of 200?Hz. The FFR spectral magnitude at 200?Hz diminished with a phase offset of 180°. Phase offsets of 90° and 270° showed reduced spectral magnitudes at 200?Hz than those in the 0° condition. Our findings, in line with the hypothesis, show that the dichotic FFRs do not reflect true dichotic processing and that they are contaminated during volume conduction. Additionally, we found harmonic distortion products (HDP) in the FFRs. We found that the response at 200?Hz and the 3rd HDP systematically varied with a change in phase of the stimulus, while the even HDPs (2nd and 4th) were phase-invariant. Based on our findings, and modeling FFRs using auditory models, we propose a rectification process as the contributors for the generation of HDPs. We also discuss the implications of this HDP generating mechanism in understanding the pitch represented in FFRs.
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.title Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products
dc.type Article
dc.issueno 1
dc.journalname Hearing research
dc.pageno 84-99
dc.terms Frequency following responses, Dichotic, Dichotic ABR, Dichotic FFR, Harmonic distortion products, Volume conduction, Pitch
dc.volumeno 380


File(s) in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account