AiiSH-iR

Social representation of “hearing loss”: cross-cultural exploratory study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Manchaiah, V
dc.contributor.author Danermark, B
dc.contributor.author Ahmadi, T
dc.contributor.author Tomé, D
dc.contributor.author Zhao, F
dc.contributor.author Li, Q
dc.contributor.author Krishna, R
dc.contributor.author Germundsson, P
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-31T10:04:16Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-31T10:04:16Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.issn 1178-1998
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S91076
dc.identifier.uri http://192.168.100.26:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3329
dc.description.abstract Background: Hearing loss is one of the most common chronic conditions in older adults. In audiology literature, several studies have examined the attitudes and behavior of people with hearing loss; however, not much is known about the manner in which society in general views and perceives hearing loss. This exploratory study was aimed at understanding the social representation of hearing loss (among the general public) in the countries of India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK. We also compared these social representations.Materials and methods: The study involved a cross-sectional design, and participants were recruited using the snowball sampling method. A total of 404 people from four countries participated in the study. Data were collected using a free-association task where participants were asked to produce up to five words or phrases that came to mind while thinking about hearing loss. In addition, they were also asked to indicate if each word they presented had positive, neutral, or negative associations in their view. Data were analyzed using various qualitative and quantitative methods.Results: The most frequently occurring categories were: assessment and management; causes of hearing loss; communication difficulties; disability; hearing ability or disability; hearing instruments; negative mental state; the attitudes of others; and sound and acoustics of the environment. Some categories were reported with similar frequency in most countries (eg, causes of hearing loss, communication difficulties, and negative mental state), whereas others differed among countries. Participants in India reported significantly more positive and fewer negative associations when compared to participants from Iran, Portugal, and the UK. However, there was no statistical difference among neutral responses reported among these countries. Also, more differences were noted among these countries than similarities.Conclusion: These findings provide useful insights into the public perception of hearing loss that may prove useful in public education and counseling.
dc.title Social representation of “hearing loss”: cross-cultural exploratory study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK
dc.type Article
dc.issueno 10
dc.journalname Clinical Interventions in Aging
dc.pageno 1857—1872
dc.terms hearing loss, hearing impairment, social representation, societal attitude, cross-culture, perception of disability
dc.volumeno 2015


File(s) in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account